Previous Page  421 / 454 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 421 / 454 Next Page
Page Background www.zeroproject.org office@zeroproject.org

related to the integration of people with disabilities within the university, and to provide services such as study support

(sign language interpretation, communication facilitation, note taking, etc.), tutoring, counselling and job placement.

I

NNOVATION

In general, the Law reflected a shift in legislative thinking from a strictly medical model perspective on disability to a

social and human rights model, and made a significant contribution to a culture of inclusion, even though it remains

enshrined in a construction of the notion of disability in terms of deficit. Evidence demonstrates (see output) that

inclusive education in Italy is not simply required by law, but is also being implemented throughout the country (even

though to a certain extent inconsistent) amounting to nothing less than a ‘cultural revolution’ in the way disability is

viewed. In the field of inclusive education of pupils with disabilities, the Law’s innovative aspects include: the creation of

a new professional figure for learning support (support teacher), the combination of clinical diagnosis, dynamic profile

and tailored education plan to determine the personal potential of the pupil, as well as the broad cross-sectorial

participation and cooperation of all stakeholders (local education authorities, local health units, etc.) in school councils,

paving the way for the experimentation of new approaches to teaching and learning (such as team teaching and

cooperative learning) with actions to be taken in all grades of schools (from infant schools to universities) and all sectors

of society (from training centers to employment settings). Italy’s ongoing practice of inclusive education has

restructured the education system at all levels and some of the most notable changes include: extending the age to

which compulsory, free education was required for all students; lowering the limits on class sizes for inclusive

classrooms; revamping the curriculum; developing new procedures for recruiting and training new teachers; improving

pre-primary and continuing education requirements; and implementing a system of national evaluations of all regions

and schools.

F

ACTS ON

O

UTPUT

(W

ITH

A

DDITIONS FROM THE

Z

ERO

P

ROJECT

T

EAM

)

In 1992, approximately 40,000 students with disabilities were in special schools or classes at primary school level. In

2010/11, approximately 189,563 students with special needs attended primary and secondary schools (of which

10,554 at private schools; a ratio of 2.3% of the overall school population), and 20,739 children with special needs

attended in mainstream pre-primary education. Making steady impressive gains, the 2010 update from the

European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education indicates that the number of students with special

needs in Italy being educated in segregated settings was less than 1%.

In 2009/10, the number of support teachers reached almost 90,000 units. 32.7 per cent of students had a support

teacher, whose work was valued fairly positively by the students concerned: the average satisfaction rating was 3.8

(rated on a scale of one to five, with one as the minimum).

A survey of 2003/2004 on 40,383 schools revealed that 30.7 percent of state schools had accessible toilets, 29.7 per

cent had doors that met accessibility requirements and 20.3 per cent had lifts or stair lifts.

Another impressive statistic is the dramatic increase in enrolment of students with disabilities in university, which

rose from 4,813 students in 2000-01 to 15,884 students enrolled at state universities within only 8 years.